errorEN 16931

BR-17:Invoice line item name required

Each invoice line must have an item name describing what is being invoiced.

Severity
Fatal
Rule set
EN 16931
Country
All EU
Fix type
INPUT REQUIRED

Engine Classification

Business data required · Explicit input workflow · No assumptions made

Required input: Item Name

What is BR-17?

BR-17 is a fatal validation rule defined in the EN 16931 specification. It validates the Name element under InvoiceLine > Item in the UBL invoice XML.

When this rule fires, the invoice is non-compliant and will be rejected by Peppol access points and national validation services. The sending system receives a rejection response and the invoice does not reach the buyer.

Target path: XPath: /Invoice/cac:InvoiceLine/cac:Item/cbc:Name

Why This Error Matters

Invoice rejected. Buyer cannot identify who to pay when it differs from the seller.

BR-17 is a hard failure. Invoices that trigger this rule are rejected at the access point and never reach the recipient. In Peppol networks, this means your sending system receives an MLR (Message Level Response) with a rejection status. The invoice must be corrected and re-sent, adding delay to your payment cycle.

Validator Behavior

  • ·Causes invoice rejection
  • ·Error returned: BR-17
  • ·Specification: EN 16931

How to Fix It

1.

Describe item

Clear description of goods or services

2.

Be specific

Include relevant details for identification

3.

Add to Item

Place in Item/Name element

Before / After

Failing XML
<cac:PartyName>
  <cbc:Name><!-- invalid or missing value --></cbc:Name>
</cac:PartyName>
Corrected XML
<cac:PartyName>
  <cbc:Name>correct-value</cbc:Name>
</cac:PartyName>

Technical Reference

XPathXPath: /Invoice/cac:InvoiceLine/cac:Item/cbc:Name
SpecEN 16931
StrategyRequires user input: Name of the payee (the party receiving payment). Cannot auto-derive because this is a legal entity name for payment routing.

Code Example

<cac:Item>
  <cbc:Name>Professional consulting services - December 2024</cbc:Name>
</cac:Item>

Common Causes

  • ·PayeeParty section added but PartyName not filled
  • ·Factoring company not fully configured in system
  • ·Third-party payment setup missing payee name
  • ·Template includes payee structure but name field empty
  • ·Payment to different entity configured without name

Seeing this in production? The API handles BR-17 automatically. See the fix response →

Commonly Seen In

All invoicing software

Frequently Asked Questions

Each invoice line must have an item name describing what is being invoiced.

This requires user input to resolve. Provide the correct value for `cbc:Name` (BT-59). Invoice Navigator detects this error and prompts for the required business data before applying a safe fix.

Yes, BR-17 is a critical error that will cause invoice rejection. It must be fixed before submission to ensure your invoice is accepted by the recipient's system.

BR-17 requires specific business data to resolve. Invoice Navigator detects the error and guides you through providing the needed information, then applies the fix with full audit documentation.

BR-17 is commonly seen in exports from All invoicing software. These software packages sometimes generate invoices that need adjustment to meet full compliance standards.

Related Content

Last updated: 3 March 2026

Share this guide:

Resolve BR-17 with Guided Input

The compliance engine detects this error and prompts for the required business data before applying a safe, auditable fix.